Fighting for Paper Ballots and Against Evidence-Free Elections.

Incestuous Relationships: Diebold, Lobbyists, and the Unethical Revolving Door Between Government and Private Enterprise.

"[Lewis] Massey, a former Georgia Secretary of State, also reported he was paid $2,000 a month by Diebold Election Systems to lobby for the state’s contract to provide electronic voting machines. Diebold eventually won that contract, which is administered by the Secretary of State."
From the Fulton County Daily Report  02/10/06


Lewis Massey, Diebold Lobbyist
Lewis Massey managed the troubled SciTrek Science Museum while lobbying for and finalizing contracts with Diebold Election Systems and Georgia's Secretary of State.  The SciTrek Museum folded shortly after Massey's departure as manager.  Democracy in Georgia came to an abrupt end with the introduction of Diebold's evidence-free,  smoke-screen voting machines.  Georgia's elections have never recovered from the 2002 implementation of the Diebold computerized voting machines, which computer scientists, accountants, and auditors all agree fail to meet any of the minimal standards of their respective professions. 

An examination of the relationship between Lewis Massey and Diebold is incomplete without mentioning that when Lewis Massey was Secretary of State, his second in command was Director of Elections, Cathy Cox, and when Cathy Cox became Secretary of State, Lewis Massey returned to his former employee Cox as a pitchman for Diebold Election Systems.  

Georgia - Strong Paper Ballot and Election Transparency Bill Introduced with Bi-Partisan Support

Senators Vincent Fort (D) and David Shafer (R) have stood up for  clean elections and co-sponsored S.B. 591,  the Georgia Vote Count Protection Act.  Other co-sponsors include Senators Meyer von Bremen (D), Horacena Tate (D), and Steve Henson (D).  Defenders Of Democracy members and election accountability supporters send thanks and cheer on these co-sponsors, and ask the Senate's State and Local Gov't Operations (SLoGO) Committee to quickly pass the bill through their committee.  Introduction of this strong election accountability bill is a milestone, but the hard part is going to be getting the bill passed.  The battle for passage has just began, and we need as many powerful Republicans and Democrats on our side as possible to make that happen. (We are a non-partisan organization.)  That will only happen with public participation from citizens across the state.  Please contact the SLoGO committee chair and committee members listed below and ask them to approve the Georgia Vote Count Protection Act.

Washington Post Editorial stands up for Election Accountability

The Post noted that Maryland's Republican Governor,  Robert Ehrlich,  has lost confidence in Maryland's all-electronic voting system, and has joined the chorus for a paper trail for Maryland's voting machines.

To read the Washington Post editorial, click here.

S.B. 500 (2006) A Weak Version of S.B. 367

The SB367 electronic voting receipts bill was essentially renamed to SB500 and it has been posted on the legislative web site. It is being co-sponsored by Senators Stephens, Staton and Wiles. Like the original SB500 that Sen. Stephens co-sponsored in 2004, the bill provides receipts that would only be used for recounts and election challenges. The original SB367 required a three county trial run for the 2006 election but that has been paired down to one precinct in each of those counties probably based on input from the Sec of State's office.  This legislation leaves 99.8% of Georgia citizens voting on evidence-free voting machines during the 2006 elections.

An Open Letter to Georgia's Secretary of State

January 26, 2006

Secretary of State Cathy Cox
State of Georgia

Ms. Cox,

Recent events in Florida have again shown how vulnerable Georgia is to election tampering.  In the past, these charges have been dismissed.  There is now even more compelling evidence that Georgia is ignoring, and we write to you today to respectfully request that you address these very important issues immediately.

You have recently indicated that you are now in favor of some type of voter verified paper trail.  What, if anything, has your office done to make this happen?